In the fear of contamination culture.
People are compulsively ritualistically rubbing antibacterial goop into their hands to ward off the non existent still unproven “corona virus”. The govt through media first created obsessive and irrational fears of contamination that then created these harmful dimwitted habits and normalized a mental affliction . OCD: obsessive and irrational use of antibacterials in an attempt to relieve severe distress associated with obsessive and irrational fears of contamination.The more irrational fear of a virus that doesn’t exist they have the more they goop chemicals on their hands .No proof that sanitizers are safe or they even work is necessary for believers. The hand sanitizing ritual makes the obsessive irrational fear( covid) real in their minds. A mind where Fear=”Covid”( =death).
The same way all they have is masks to prove “covid” exists which is why masks were central and were made mandatory. People can’t be wearing these face diapers that make them breathe back in exhaled (EBC) just because they were told to by authorities could they? Exhaled breath condensate (EBC). Compounds identified in EBC include adenosine, ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, isoprostanes, leukotrienes, nitrogen oxides (NOx), peptides, cytokines, protons and various ions. ” studying the airway chemical and inflammatory environment is still in its infancy, with questions as yet remaining unanswered.” sounds like they should answer questions before forcing us to inhale our exhalations .
Its the irrational fear and stress generated by govts through the media that needs to be looked at but almost no ones looking inside. Very few are questioning.Their minds were frozen with fear and are clouded with fear. Fear is perceived as a weakness so it is rapidly switched to anger and all the negative compulsive thoughts associated with fear and anger.Their thinking then becomes doing and the doing is a toxic reflection of their thinking.They are easily incited to riots, racism and looting as thats what their minds were programmed to do.
The ” covid” cult beliefs are unbelievable . There is no isolated ” new virus” Sars CoV2. Said ” virus”( a computer generated string of rna) does not exist. There is no proof of transmission or infection of a ” new disease” at any distance. The govt mandated isolation is causing many people psychological problems and is felt to be torture for some. Social distancing and making people fear touch, hugs and close contact with others is terrible . Locking healthy people up and stressing them out only makes people unwell.
We saw in Germany recently how the protests against govt fascism and tyranny could not be stopped by govt. The realization of the knowledge of this power . Do we want to give our power away by consent in order to be governed by tyrants who have unlawfully taken away our rights and freedoms ?
What can we do to help or change the dire situation? I believe we can only “be the change we want to see in this world”
To be and to act in love and contentedness from this state of being.
To choose love in the time of fear takes courage and you can find all the strength you need inside yourself .So take time to first center yourself with daily practice of mindfulness/mediation. And this can come in many forms Yoga,walking in nature, formal sitting, breath awareness,Qi gong, Tai chi , whatever practice brings you back to your true self. You real Self is not fear its courage and it is love itself.
Insanity, fear and isolation from the Self is the disease, Awareness is the cure .
BDBinc 
I am campaigning in my town to remove the requirement to wear a mask in public venues. Is there a resource you can name that has the best current information on the effects of mask wear that are not being discussed in all the hysteria? Your mention above of Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a great start. Thank you…
From Arthur Firstenberg, author of The Invisible Rainbow
As a person who went to medical school, I was shocked when I read Neil Orr’s study, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=5pWUlTIuGE06-ZHa0VCe4I_qSfnC7OWtGBV7eJ2ghHUA2okYan8Vw7Us81Cam2q4b4C5LH1-X9sbPudiWz0_TDMAJI-ZiyfTsedqOc7jiRI~ ) published in 1981 in the Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Dr. Orr was a surgeon in the Severalls Surgical Unit in Colchester. And for six months, from March through August 1980, the surgeons and staff in that unit decided to see what would happen if they did not wear masks during surgeries. They wore no masks for six months, and compared the rate of surgical wound infections from March through August 1980 with the rate of wound infections from March through August of the previous four years. And they discovered, to their amazement, that when nobody wore masks during surgeries, the rate of wound infections was less than half what it was when everyone wore masks. Their conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all” and that wearing a mask during surgery “is a standard procedure that could be abandoned.”
I was so amazed that I scoured the medical literature, sure that this was a fluke and that newer studies must show the utility of masks in preventing the spread of disease. But to my surprise the medical literature for the past forty-five years has been consistent: masks are useless in preventing the spread of disease and, if anything, are unsanitary objects that themselves spread bacteria and viruses.
• Ritter et al., (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=AOc6OY7m0UhIwY2-jt5DP5Vcy-DzYbPnkarvrXHbFSYR_FyvPvxm0SgLhmf1rkTYBH80aYwSb_a1D_DjFA6Y23VD5RLizwLJSabxoOi8cJk~ ) in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”
• Ha’eri and Wiley, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=kEEPJoYAQwKseYS6l_Km7UW6gKTZJUDynBrAdAR9E6njPi4EwXKNgpUl_2cBVqqImqrUs2EZFVXOFr93ARsUNQfXKhoVN39dCheAAwGEPOQ~ ) in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”
• Laslett and Sabin, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=qZs0aVVketw1nwBT-PFDMe7te7AK_OEzlM-kqU0B6NJeWwS8SbSOGtTb8-5XzMoSh7DSaFTHAR8SzdCS8OQnExBZPfJ0zuo1T3bNwEMbM0Y~ ) in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
• In Tunevall’s 1991 study, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=Yylkv9kLusD1HA_z7jd_MCb2KfWxO0NXsMjW9l5rZSF5K_tiWhJq5qL_agL5AdhoypdRFQozpIFSx5xm92DyxV97ugllS_0GyyHvjg9tubI~ ) a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
• A review by Skinner and Sutton (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=UHrXjmYk6RS3NvpB6iOpMZ6C5pV79OEI_SWG9dT2C8kJ7IXMGFCSbGbuTHnUKzNw6FXJa21hQbWKbwuDYTEYNqV00ef1Yp20kvXxjk_P-8Y~ ) in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.”
• Lahme et al., (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=H-N5p1-Nj4pimPxJlanRzXliEcPbZep3VutUrHYEUfvKM3SHYOlJGDTnE75gJ2Ph3QK88hDqR0wy3SXB6RZc-5GM30EjS6yE4WqlaYxXwho~ ) in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”
• Figueiredo et al., (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=LxaYe1H-AZI9fNbPLVlEnEehzjrDD7XrnPWaZVrwSfrDpzR-q9j1EplzWFs0SrfMbuHUj8xrijFkZklVxCc_LS5hj6TLejpofXKrz8Ofvpg~ ) in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
• Bahli (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=KFBUs_nQnmMas-lMacSsmvs3g9zGzzUdv6DNO1RCkazfcsJvhpUAEFzXhffjOrCQXJu58lWeS0XuWsXCWMYmJc5txVVxrc_UTZiADgTvpg4~ ) did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.”
• Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=daRKOtNo7tzoJncUpATVEnOEAloZpUKUVjswAHJf9CMYzleWOGXxCDQSQaVhD-S6pGXMNrhYEwsrxMVZECIOFcuBJxe3n2aMnW-lx22NeI4~ ) in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
• Webster et al., (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=ziu7Ts1R42267HWsUVJXBIPtjDC0cuX4OioUuhGFf_IsPlIpYt2twMVcjLK3Y8rnD8uoNXL1QQXzykQ2lETAzriaFrAiJH1rM5tMuIWwpVs~ ) in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
• Lipp and Edwards (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=ARXXaK_DQhp4rfYRlt2EZ1b1hM2ACWJ7s_-nAioaK0UoZp2L-UR00VzmMNPtoIogik63R8WvRjfcs2UVT-jPBuH3ZmBKQBThhbvphoiFcTA~ ) reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=DfrPdJVg0Yyhlzeg7iSPcfWUox6HSA0aNTRQIcobwrS_LORfNOmotixGOKHTy30jDIkEx9ujjsNyN3E3MruCDn1alpd7RosYNuskMkPJlhU~ ) updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
• Carøe, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=TrEBnEVn8jYkZLLQpo–uOG6KBYLeNKxseMckVvHQ3oRXaMJ8vXfgjj2DqySDnwmtaF3EpHyoSSv6PEInVhaU6sj7TBcwhnEQh3Psg5HtEU~ ) in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”
• Salassa and Swiontkowski, (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=Tyx-OHQBTGHuJES76qPVPWBlPjeHeXICaIMI3z32EoB_s3AB_2iH9d4jO9s6GDN9EFDKfbA-YgBSsMF7-7OxdEePWoJllpHPOX8l4I35GP0~ ) in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”
• Da Zhou et al., (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=zRrn1eLhT22vAbHNb43mE8DomXQwHTYrS9l-kskcCogsyhBEPUquQ80yn5iyaX215hWb5Yr8PLOxytwVcYPNQNTg_6to9SLmQbaTTnsU9h8~ ) reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”
Schools in China are now prohibiting students from wearing masks (https://app.cyberimpact.com/click-tracking?ct=zNf-4-BBxzREV22jRl51LIgAzjlA1Syq7uy6Fe_XGWdOgFVaVkLlVZbbVMdz-pCBDrnAml41m2nwOrcAhZF74npQCnYMR2nlnXZE0soGjX4~ ) while exercising.
Why? Because it was killing them. It was depriving them of oxygen and it was killing them.
All my best wishes for your campaign against masks(fascism) .Masks are a symbol of your belief in the Big lie( covid). Which is why they make them mandatory, as some sort of perverse inverted material proof of their lie( covid).
Restricting the flow of oxygen in and breathing back in EBC, doesn’t sound like a smart or healthy idea. Especially when there is no evidence to support the use of them for the purpose intended . And no evidence of a new virus or new disease I might add.
I only looked in global research and the freedom articles below for links for you but there are many other sources .
https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-face-masks-effective-evidence/5720209
https://thefreedomarticles.com/hypoxia-blood-clot-connection-study-cdc-who-study/
“According to Dr. Russell Blaylock: by wearing a face mask, the exhaled rna , molecules, EBC “will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/does-the-face-mask-protect-you-from-covid-ask-dr-anthony-fauci-when-he-spoke-against-the-mask-it-was-categorized-as-fake-news/5721808
“Dr. Denis Rancourt, PhD who examined the issue on behalf of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Rancourt conducted extensive research with an emphasis on masks and did a thorough review of science literature concentrating on whether any evidence exists that masks can reduce infection risk of “viral” respiratory disease.” Found there is none. Again there is no evidence to support the UN’s( Govts) claims.https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-face-masks-effective-evidence/5720209